{"id":1111,"date":"2009-02-19T16:33:38","date_gmt":"2009-02-19T16:33:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/newwf.benfredaconsulting.com\/?p=1111"},"modified":"2022-01-31T22:33:29","modified_gmt":"2022-01-31T22:33:29","slug":"a-call-to-service","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newwf.org\/a-call-to-service\/","title":{"rendered":"A Call to Service"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

The Obama presidency has begun with a resounding call to service. While an active citizenry and an ethos of participation is something necessary and worthy of celebration, it is not a sufficient condition for real change.<\/p>\n

Historically, America has always been a volunteer society. So have most others. In fact, volunteer behavior like collaboration is what makes society? even competitive society? possible. We rely on unpaid help from others in all walks of life, starting at home and in the neighborhood.<\/p>\n

But if volunteerism is to pave the way to community renewal and national recovery it will have to be planful. And if it is to be the engine of an active citizenry, it must also be considered more than a charitable reflex. What is the difference?<\/h4>\n

If volunteerism were to become a significant factor of creating change in societies…<\/p>\n